PENITENTIARY LAW GENERAL RULES AND CONCURRENT LEGISLATION

THE CASE OF CHARGING FOR ELECTRONIC MONITORING AT BRAZILIAN STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY

Authors

  • Thyerrí José Cruz Silva Universidade Tiradentes
  • Ana Cristina Almeida Santana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-381X.2024v9n3p376-390

Abstract

Legislative powers and general rules constitute two of the most complex issues in Brazilian legislative activity and constitutional law. State bills aimed at imposing charges for electronic criminal monitoring are justified based on concurrent legislative competence in penitentiary law and the (in)existence of a general rule regulating the matter. This article aims to analyze the charge for electronic criminal monitoring in relation to the legal arguments presented in state legislative proposals, legislative opinions and government vetoes. The research is carried out based on bibliographical study, mapping of legislative projects, analysis and discussion of their results. It is expected to contribute to the discussion about general norms in Brazilian law, especially in the field of penitentiary law, which deals with criminal executions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Thyerrí José Cruz Silva, Universidade Tiradentes

Mestrando em Direitos Humanos pela Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT/SE). Graduado em Direito pela Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT/SE).

Ana Cristina Almeida Santana

Doutora em Educação pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). Mestre em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente pela Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS). Especialista em Direito Processual pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Graduada em Direito pela Universidade Tiradentes (UNIT). Advogada inscrita na OAB/SE.

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Cruz Silva, T. J., & Almeida Santana, A. C. (2024). PENITENTIARY LAW GENERAL RULES AND CONCURRENT LEGISLATION: THE CASE OF CHARGING FOR ELECTRONIC MONITORING AT BRAZILIAN STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY. Interfaces Científicas - Direito, 9(3), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.17564/2316-381X.2024v9n3p376-390